In terms of multimedia, Helio P35 has No NPU with storage type as eMMC 5.1 and Exynos 7884B has No NPU and eMMC 5.1 storage type. Multimedia and Connectivity Comparison: Helio P35 vs Exynos 7884B It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset. Memory Comparison: Helio P35 vs Exynos 7884Bįirst chipset has max size of 6 GB and Samsung Exynos 7884B has max size of 6 GB. Samsung Exynos 7884B has Mali-G71 MP2 GPU with GPU Frequency as 770 MHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has. Dynamic frequency allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 1.6GHz. MediaTek Helio P35 has IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU with GPU Frequency as 680 MHz. Graphics Comparison: Helio P35 vs Exynos 7884B A larger cache time leads to faster performance. Former one has 8 core and 2300 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 1560 MHz frequency. Helio P35 comes up with the architecture of Rogue and Exynos 7884B comes up with architecture of Bifrost. CPU Comparison: Helio P35 vs Exynos 7884BĬPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Helio P35 has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 99120 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 44240, 11001, 27983, 15002 respectively. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below: Benchmark Comparison: Helio P35 vs Exynos 7884Bīenchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Which model has higher base frequency among Helio. In terms of Graphics, MediaTek Helio P35 has IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU and Rogue architecture and latter Samsung Exynos 7884B comes up with Mali-G71 MP2 GPU and Bifrost architecture. MediaTek Helio P35 has been announced on December 2018 whereas Samsung Exynos 7884B has been announced on September 2019. Exynos 7884B has higher AnTuTu score at 109366 compare to Helio P35 with total AnTuTu score at 99120 only. MediaTek Helio P35 comes up with 8 cores, 2300 MHz frequency and on the other hand, Samsung Exynos 7884B has 8 cores and 1560 MHz frequency. Samsung Exynos 7884 vs MediaTek Helio G35 Benchmark, comparison and differences Samsung Exynos 7884 vs MediaTek Helio G35 Last updated: CPU comparison with benchmarks Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.3GHz. Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets. Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the MediaTek MT6765 Helio P35 on one side and the Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B on the other side. MediaTek Helio P35 comes up with 8 cores, 2300 MHz frequency and on the other hand, Samsung Exynos 7884B has 8 cores and 1560 MHz frequency. Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Samsung Exynos 7904 - Benchmarks, Tests and Comparisons. MediaTek Helio P35 has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 99120 and Samsung Exynos 7884B has AnTuTu score of 109366. We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 7870 (with Mali-T830 MP1 graphics) and MediaTek Helio P35 (PowerVR GE8320). For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.What is the difference between MediaTek Helio P35 and Samsung Exynos 7884B? Should you buy phone having MediaTek Helio P35 or should go for Samsung Exynos 7884B? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. The multi threaded performance is quite good thanks to 8 cores, the single threaded performance suffers a bit from the small A55 cores, although the clock rate of up to 2 GHz can help a bit. These scores are only anĪverage of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results. Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |